CONTOUR Architecten SRL
1.2 FTECONTOUR Architecten reported total assets of 549,771 € at the end of the 2025 financial year (annual accounts filed with the NBB on 27 Jun 2026), with 1.2 full-time equivalent.
The score of CONTOUR Architecten shows with a free account.
See the score- Summary? / 5
- Balance sheet strength
- Liquidity
- Repayment capacity
- Profitability
- Trajectory
- Compliance and register
- Position in its sectorvs peers
- Supplier creditat 30 d
- Borrowing capacityborrowable
- Valuationcentral
Visible once signed in: create your account, the 14-day Pro trial is free.
Key figures 2025
Accounts of the company itself (not consolidated).
The full file covers 2 financial years; a free account shows 2. →Deterministic calculation on the filed accounts, no AI. Dispute the score or report an error
CONTOUR Architecten's annual accounts
Filed annual accounts
- Year ended 31 Dec 2025filed on 27 Jun 2026
- Year ended 31 Dec 2024filed on 28 Jul 2025
CONTOUR Architecten's financial analysis
- Solvency31.3%sector median: 53.0%
- Current ratio
- Net margin
- ROE
- Financial debt / EBITDA
- Interest coverage
- Days sales outstanding (DSO)
Management and control of CONTOUR Architecten
CONTOUR Architecten's publications in the Belgian Gazette
Company number, VAT number and registered office
- Company number (CBE)
- 1007.780.312
- VAT number
- BE1007780312
- Peppol
- Registered · 0208:1007780312 · as of 10 Nov 2026
- Legal form
- SRL
- Incorporated
- 29 Mar 2024
- Registered office
- 3600 Genk
- Size
- Micro · 1.2 FTE
- Latest accounts
- 2025 · filed on 27 Jun 2026
- Activity
- Activities of building architects (NACE 71111)
CONTOUR Architecten (SRL) has been based in Genk since 2024, active in: activities of building architects. For 2025, it reports a net profit of 108,461 € and equity of 172,005 €; its revenue is not published. With 1.2 full-time equivalents, it is a micro-enterprise by headcount. Its solvency stands at 31.3%, below the median of its sector (53.0%).
Guide: Reading Belgian SME accounts: the five figures that count →
Companies similar to CONTOUR Architecten
Companies in the same business, of comparable size and area, outside its group.
- Stedenbouwkundige Architect Schroijen Architectural activities Maaseik · balance sheet 331,549 €
- DAST-Architectenduo Architectural activities Hasselt · balance sheet 322,295 €
- Degroote Architecte et Developpement Architectural activities Tournai · balance sheet 390,010 €
- Architectenburo Loots³ Architectural activities Lommel · balance sheet 383,232 €
- Urban Nation & Gicart-Renaud, Architectes Architectural activities Mons · balance sheet 190,961 €
- Danny Chis Architectural activities Asse · balance sheet 151,449 €
- AE+Architectuur Architectural activities Sint-Truiden · balance sheet 544,280 €
- Atelier d'Architectes AKTEPE-NAEM Architectural activities Mons · balance sheet 576,992 €
Frequently asked questions about CONTOUR Architecten
What is the revenue of CONTOUR Architecten?
CONTOUR Architecten files its accounts in a format where revenue is optional: it is not published for 2025.
What is the VAT number of CONTOUR Architecten?
In Belgium, the VAT number is the company number prefixed with BE: BE1007780312 for CONTOUR Architecten, if the company is VAT-registered. Its company number (CBE) is 1007.780.312.
Where is the registered office of CONTOUR Architecten?
According to the CBE register, the registered office of CONTOUR Architecten is in 3600 Genk.
What is the equity of CONTOUR Architecten?
At the close of the 2025 financial year, the equity of CONTOUR Architecten amounts to 172,005 €, a solvency of 31.3% of total assets.
How many people work at CONTOUR Architecten?
1.2 full-time equivalents on average according to the 2025 social balance sheet.
Who manages CONTOUR Architecten?
The register lists 2 active mandates at CONTOUR Architecten. Names and roles are in the full file, with the deeds published in the Belgian Gazette.
The full file of CONTOUR Architecten
Directors and mandates, ownership network, Gazette deeds, ten years of accounts and ratios, Excel export, and Idonis's analysis in one question.
Open the full file →