LegalDirect 2.0 SRL
LegalDirect 2.0 reported total assets of 682,119 € at the end of the 2025 financial year (annual accounts filed with the NBB on 31 Aug 2026).
By total assets for 2025, LegalDirect 2.0 ranks among the 5,000 largest of the 12,858 companies in its sector (NACE 6910) in Belgium that filed accounts for that financial year. Largest companies in the sector →
The score of LegalDirect 2.0 shows with a free account.
See the score- Summary? / 5
- Balance sheet strength
- Liquidity
- Repayment capacity
- Profitability
- Trajectory
- Compliance and register
- Position in its sectorvs peers
- Supplier creditat 30 d
- Borrowing capacityborrowable
- Valuationcentral
Visible once signed in: create your account, the 14-day Pro trial is free.
Key figures 2025
Accounts of the company itself (not consolidated).
Deterministic calculation on the filed accounts, no AI. Dispute the score or report an error
LegalDirect 2.0's annual accounts
| 2025 | |
|---|---|
| Net result | 202,071 € |
| Equity | 40,207 € |
| Cash | 254,106 € |
| EBITDA | 271,991 € |
| Total assets | 682,119 € |
Filed annual accounts
- Year ended 31 Dec 2025filed on 31 Aug 2026
LegalDirect 2.0's financial analysis
- Solvency5.9%sector median: 57.2%
- Current ratio
- Net margin
- ROE
- Financial debt / EBITDA
- Interest coverage
- Days sales outstanding (DSO)
Management and control of LegalDirect 2.0
LegalDirect 2.0's publications in the Belgian Gazette
Company number, VAT number and registered office
- Company number (CBE)
- 1004.997.501
- VAT number
- BE1004997501
- Peppol
- Registered · 0208:1004997501 · as of 10 Nov 2026
- Legal form
- SRL
- Incorporated
- 22 Jan 2024
- Registered office
- 3010 Leuven
- Latest accounts
- 2025 · filed on 31 Aug 2026
- Activity
- Activities of lawyers (NACE 69101)
LegalDirect 2.0 (SRL) has been based in Leuven since 2024, active in: activities of lawyers. For 2025, it reports a net profit of 202,071 € and equity of 40,207 €; its revenue is not published. Its solvency stands at 5.9%, below the median of its sector (57.2%).
Guide: Reading Belgian SME accounts: the five figures that count →
Companies similar to LegalDirect 2.0
Companies in the same business, of comparable size and area, outside its group.
- Willem Cloet Legal activities Brussels · balance sheet 682,571 €
- GDS Avocats Legal activities Woluwe-Saint-Lambert · balance sheet 681,165 €
- De Wit-Maeyaert Legal activities Willebroek · balance sheet 683,427 €
- Annabelle Lepiece S.R.L. Legal activities Sint-Genesius-Rode · balance sheet 679,093 €
- moov.law Legal activities Brussels · balance sheet 686,178 €
- Intakt Law Legal activities Ixelles · balance sheet 677,905 €
- Denis Philippe Legal activities Watermael-Boitsfort · balance sheet 774,208 €
- Bernard Maingain, Avocat Legal activities Auderghem · balance sheet 688,290 €
Frequently asked questions about LegalDirect 2.0
What is the revenue of LegalDirect 2.0?
LegalDirect 2.0 files its accounts in a format where revenue is optional: it is not published for 2025.
What is the VAT number of LegalDirect 2.0?
In Belgium, the VAT number is the company number prefixed with BE: BE1004997501 for LegalDirect 2.0, if the company is VAT-registered. Its company number (CBE) is 1004.997.501.
Where is the registered office of LegalDirect 2.0?
According to the CBE register, the registered office of LegalDirect 2.0 is in 3010 Leuven.
What is the equity of LegalDirect 2.0?
At the close of the 2025 financial year, the equity of LegalDirect 2.0 amounts to 40,207 €, a solvency of 5.9% of total assets.
Who manages LegalDirect 2.0?
The register lists 4 active mandates at LegalDirect 2.0. Names and roles are in the full file, with the deeds published in the Belgian Gazette.
How large is LegalDirect 2.0 within its sector?
By total assets for 2025, LegalDirect 2.0 ranks among the 5,000 largest of the 12,858 companies in its sector (NACE 6910) in Belgium that filed accounts for that financial year.
The full file of LegalDirect 2.0
Directors and mandates, ownership network, Gazette deeds, ten years of accounts and ratios, Excel export, and Idonis's analysis in one question.
Open the full file →