MDM Brandbeveiliging SPRL
Ouverture de faillite 2.7 FTEMDM Brandbeveiliging reported total assets of 91,159 € at the end of the 2017 financial year (annual accounts filed with the NBB on 06 Nov 2018), with 2.7 full-time equivalents.
The score of MDM Brandbeveiliging shows with a free account.
See the score- Summary? / 5
- Balance sheet strength
- Liquidity
- Repayment capacity
- Profitability
- Trajectory
- Compliance and register
- Position in its sectorvs peers
- Supplier creditat 30 d
- Borrowing capacityborrowable
- Valuationcentral
Visible once signed in: create your account, the 14-day Pro trial is free.
Key figures 2017
Accounts of the company itself (not consolidated).
The full file covers 2 financial years; a free account shows 2. →Deterministic calculation on the filed accounts, no AI. Dispute the score or report an error
MDM Brandbeveiliging's annual accounts
Filed annual accounts
- Year ended 31 Dec 2017filed on 06 Nov 2018
- Year ended 31 Dec 2016filed on 30 Aug 2017
MDM Brandbeveiliging's financial analysis
- Solvency25.3%sector median: 48.5%
- Current ratio
- Net margin
- ROE
- Financial debt / EBITDA
- Interest coverage
- Days sales outstanding (DSO)
Management and control of MDM Brandbeveiliging
MDM Brandbeveiliging's publications in the Belgian Gazette
Company number, VAT number and registered office
- Company number (CBE)
- 0830.084.626
- VAT number
- BE0830084626
- Peppol
- Not found on Peppol as of 10 Nov 2026 · Check
- Legal form
- SPRL
- Incorporated
- 29 Sep 2010
- Registered office
- 3600 Genk
- Size
- Micro · 2.7 FTE
- Latest accounts
- 2017 · filed on 06 Nov 2018
- Activity
- Security activities n.e.c. (NACE 80090)
MDM Brandbeveiliging (SPRL) has been based in Genk since 2010, active in: security activities n.e.c.. For 2017, it reports a net loss of 42,484 € and equity of 23,084 €; its revenue is not published. With 2.7 full-time equivalents, it is a micro-enterprise by headcount. Its solvency stands at 25.3%, below the median of its sector (48.5%).
Guide: Reading Belgian SME accounts: the five figures that count →
Companies similar to MDM Brandbeveiliging
Same activity (NACE code), registered office in the same province, closest balance-sheet size.
- P.M. Intelligent Support Security activities n.e.c. Heusden-Zolder · balance sheet 97,060 €
- EEDI Security activities n.e.c. Pelt · balance sheet 110,349 €
- Securityland Systems Security activities n.e.c. Sint-Truiden · balance sheet 68,840 €
- Secutechnic Security activities n.e.c. Dilsen-Stokkem · balance sheet 55,955 €
- TC Safety Security activities n.e.c. Beringen · balance sheet 150,564 €
- Auto-Electro Quintens Security activities n.e.c. Hasselt · balance sheet 239,295 €
- Total Security Security activities n.e.c. Lummen · balance sheet 672,027 €
- Entrya Technologies Security activities n.e.c. Dilsen-Stokkem · balance sheet €1.03m
Frequently asked questions about MDM Brandbeveiliging
What is the revenue of MDM Brandbeveiliging?
MDM Brandbeveiliging files its accounts in a format where revenue is optional: it is not published for 2017.
What is the VAT number of MDM Brandbeveiliging?
In Belgium, the VAT number is the company number prefixed with BE: BE0830084626 for MDM Brandbeveiliging, if the company is VAT-registered. Its company number (CBE) is 0830.084.626.
Where is the registered office of MDM Brandbeveiliging?
According to the CBE register, the registered office of MDM Brandbeveiliging is in 3600 Genk.
What is the equity of MDM Brandbeveiliging?
At the close of the 2017 financial year, the equity of MDM Brandbeveiliging amounts to 23,084 €, a solvency of 25.3% of total assets.
How many people work at MDM Brandbeveiliging?
2.7 full-time equivalents on average according to the 2017 social balance sheet.
Who manages MDM Brandbeveiliging?
The register lists 4 active mandates at MDM Brandbeveiliging. Names and roles are in the full file, with the deeds published in the Belgian Gazette.
The full file of MDM Brandbeveiliging
Directors and mandates, ownership network, Gazette deeds, ten years of accounts and ratios, Excel export, and Idonis's analysis in one question.
Open the full file →