TAK. Landschapsarchitecten SRL
TAK. Landschapsarchitecten reported total assets of 42,331 € at the end of the 2025 financial year (annual accounts filed with the NBB on 30 Jun 2026).
The score of TAK. Landschapsarchitecten shows with a free account.
See the score- Summary? / 5
- Balance sheet strength
- Liquidity
- Repayment capacity
- Profitability
- Trajectory
- Compliance and register
- Position in its sectorvs peers
- Supplier creditat 30 d
- Borrowing capacityborrowable
- Valuationcentral
Visible once signed in: create your account, the 14-day Pro trial is free.
Key figures 2025
Change 2022 → 2025: Equity +28 % Total assets +5 %
Accounts of the company itself (not consolidated).
The full file covers 5 financial years; a free account shows 2. →Deterministic calculation on the filed accounts, no AI. Dispute the score or report an error
TAK. Landschapsarchitecten's annual accounts
Filed annual accounts
- Year ended 31 Dec 2025filed on 30 Jun 2026
- Year ended 31 Dec 2024filed on 02 Jul 2025
- Year ended 31 Dec 2023filed on 22 Jun 2024
- Year ended 31 Dec 2022filed on 27 Jun 2023
- Year ended 31 Dec 2021filed on 20 Jun 2022
TAK. Landschapsarchitecten's financial analysis
- Solvency53.2%sector median: 53.0%
- Current ratio
- Net margin
- ROE
- Financial debt / EBITDA
- Interest coverage
- Days sales outstanding (DSO)
Management and control of TAK. Landschapsarchitecten
TAK. Landschapsarchitecten's publications in the Belgian Gazette
Company number, VAT number and registered office
- Company number (CBE)
- 0764.418.594
- VAT number
- BE0764418594
- Peppol
- Registered · 0208:0764418594 · as of 10 Nov 2026
- Legal form
- SRL
- Incorporated
- 26 Feb 2021
- Registered office
- 9032 Ghent
- Latest accounts
- 2025 · filed on 30 Jun 2026
- Activity
- Activities of urban, landscape and garden architects (NACE 71113)
TAK. Landschapsarchitecten (SRL) has been based in Ghent since 2021, active in: activities of urban, landscape and garden architects. For 2025, it reports a net profit of 394 € and equity of 22,518 €; its revenue is not published. Its solvency stands at 53.2%, above the median of its sector (53.0%).
Guide: Reading Belgian SME accounts: the five figures that count →
Companies similar to TAK. Landschapsarchitecten
Companies in the same business, of comparable size and area, outside its group.
- CO.plus Architectural activities Evergem · balance sheet 9,612 €
- Living Consulting Architectural activities Ghent · balance sheet 60,718 €
- Ovadis Architectural activities Ghent · balance sheet 165,702 €
- Gerotek Tekenbureau Architectural activities Bree · balance sheet 40,846 €
- Cosignus Architectural activities Menen · balance sheet 120,659 €
- Cadqon Architectural activities Bruges · balance sheet 34,525 €
- Francois Schittecatte Architectural activities Aywaille · balance sheet 40,161 €
- Sidex Engineering activities and related technical consultancy Lanaken · balance sheet 45,229 €
Frequently asked questions about TAK. Landschapsarchitecten
What is the revenue of TAK. Landschapsarchitecten?
TAK. Landschapsarchitecten files its accounts in a format where revenue is optional: it is not published for 2025.
What is the VAT number of TAK. Landschapsarchitecten?
In Belgium, the VAT number is the company number prefixed with BE: BE0764418594 for TAK. Landschapsarchitecten, if the company is VAT-registered. Its company number (CBE) is 0764.418.594.
Where is the registered office of TAK. Landschapsarchitecten?
According to the CBE register, the registered office of TAK. Landschapsarchitecten is in 9032 Ghent.
What is the equity of TAK. Landschapsarchitecten?
At the close of the 2025 financial year, the equity of TAK. Landschapsarchitecten amounts to 22,518 €, a solvency of 53.2% of total assets.
Who manages TAK. Landschapsarchitecten?
The register lists 5 active mandates at TAK. Landschapsarchitecten. Names and roles are in the full file, with the deeds published in the Belgian Gazette.
The full file of TAK. Landschapsarchitecten
Directors and mandates, ownership network, Gazette deeds, ten years of accounts and ratios, Excel export, and Idonis's analysis in one question.
Open the full file →