Dimitri Kloeck Advocatenkantoor SRL
Dimitri Kloeck Advocatenkantoor reported total assets of 80,402 € at the end of the 2024 financial year (annual accounts filed with the NBB on 25 Apr 2026).
The score of Dimitri Kloeck Advocatenkantoor shows with a free account.
See the score- Summary? / 5
- Balance sheet strength
- Liquidity
- Repayment capacity
- Profitability
- Trajectory
- Compliance and register
- Position in its sectorvs peers
- Supplier creditat 30 d
- Borrowing capacityborrowable
- Valuationcentral
Visible once signed in: create your account, the 14-day Pro trial is free.
Key figures 2024
Change 2021 → 2024: Total assets -8 %
Accounts of the company itself (not consolidated).
The full file covers 5 financial years; a free account shows 2. →Deterministic calculation on the filed accounts, no AI. Dispute the score or report an error
Dimitri Kloeck Advocatenkantoor's annual accounts
Filed annual accounts
- Year ended 31 Dec 2024filed on 25 Apr 2026
- Year ended 31 Dec 2023filed on 22 Jun 2024
- Year ended 31 Dec 2022filed on 28 Jun 2023
- Year ended 31 Dec 2021filed on 12 Aug 2022
- Year ended 31 Dec 2020filed on 30 Aug 2021
Dimitri Kloeck Advocatenkantoor's financial analysis
- Solvency-12.8%sector median: 57.2%
- Current ratio
- Net margin
- ROE
- Financial debt / EBITDA
- Interest coverage
- Days sales outstanding (DSO)
Management and control of Dimitri Kloeck Advocatenkantoor
Dimitri Kloeck Advocatenkantoor's publications in the Belgian Gazette
Company number, VAT number and registered office
- Company number (CBE)
- 0747.631.953
- VAT number
- BE0747631953
- Peppol
- Not found on Peppol as of 10 Nov 2026 · Check
- Legal form
- SRL
- Incorporated
- 26 May 2020
- Registered office
- 2960 Brecht
- Latest accounts
- 2024 · filed on 25 Apr 2026
- Activity
- Activities of lawyers (NACE 69101)
Dimitri Kloeck Advocatenkantoor (SRL) has been based in Brecht since 2020, active in: activities of lawyers. For 2024, it reports a net loss of 5,163 € and equity of −10,276 €; its revenue is not published.
Guide: Reading Belgian SME accounts: the five figures that count →
Companies similar to Dimitri Kloeck Advocatenkantoor
Companies in the same business, of comparable size and area, outside its group.
- Advocatenkantoor Mile End Legal Legal activities Antwerp · balance sheet 80,339 €
- Annemie Peeters Advocatenkantoor Legal activities Antwerp · balance sheet 80,314 €
- Dhollander Advocaten Legal activities Sint-Gillis-Waas · balance sheet 80,304 €
- Thomas Christiaens Legal activities Antwerp · balance sheet 80,556 €
- MaKe Law Legal activities Duffel · balance sheet 80,084 €
- Julie Raymaekers Advocaat Legal activities Mortsel · balance sheet 80,758 €
- Advocaat Julie Vermeulen Legal activities Lier · balance sheet 79,935 €
- Avocat Alexandra Tieleman Legal activities Woluwe-Saint-Pierre · balance sheet 80,117 €
Frequently asked questions about Dimitri Kloeck Advocatenkantoor
What is the revenue of Dimitri Kloeck Advocatenkantoor?
Dimitri Kloeck Advocatenkantoor files its accounts in a format where revenue is optional: it is not published for 2024.
What is the VAT number of Dimitri Kloeck Advocatenkantoor?
In Belgium, the VAT number is the company number prefixed with BE: BE0747631953 for Dimitri Kloeck Advocatenkantoor, if the company is VAT-registered. Its company number (CBE) is 0747.631.953.
Where is the registered office of Dimitri Kloeck Advocatenkantoor?
According to the CBE register, the registered office of Dimitri Kloeck Advocatenkantoor is in 2960 Brecht.
What is the equity of Dimitri Kloeck Advocatenkantoor?
At the close of the 2024 financial year, the equity of Dimitri Kloeck Advocatenkantoor amounts to -10,276 €, a solvency of -12.8% of total assets.
Who manages Dimitri Kloeck Advocatenkantoor?
The register lists 1 active mandates at Dimitri Kloeck Advocatenkantoor. Names and roles are in the full file, with the deeds published in the Belgian Gazette.
The full file of Dimitri Kloeck Advocatenkantoor
Directors and mandates, ownership network, Gazette deeds, ten years of accounts and ratios, Excel export, and Idonis's analysis in one question.
Open the full file →