Triangle Architectes SRL
The score of Triangle Architectes shows with a free account.
See the score- Summary? / 5
- Balance sheet strength
- Liquidity
- Repayment capacity
- Profitability
- Trajectory
- Compliance and register
- Position in its sectorvs peers
- Supplier creditat 30 d
- Borrowing capacityborrowable
- Valuationcentral
Visible once signed in: create your account, the 14-day Pro trial is free.
Key figures 2025
Change 2022 → 2025: Equity -25 % Total assets +8 %
Accounts of the company itself (not consolidated).
The full file covers 10 financial years; a free account shows 2. →Deterministic calculation on the filed accounts, no AI. Dispute the score or report an error
Triangle Architectes's annual accounts
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net result | 105,740 € | ||||
| Equity | 141,579 € | ||||
| Cash | 82,380 € | ||||
| EBITDA | 151,959 € | ||||
| Total assets | 231,995 € |
Filed annual accounts
- Year ended 31 Dec 2025filed on 03 Jun 2026
- Year ended 31 Dec 2024filed on 02 Jun 2025
- Year ended 31 Dec 2023filed on 05 Jun 2024
- Year ended 31 Dec 2022filed on 06 Jun 2023
- Year ended 31 Dec 2021filed on 01 Aug 2022
Triangle Architectes's financial analysis
- Solvency61.0%sector median: 48.0%
- Current ratio
- Net margin
- ROE
- Financial debt / EBITDA
- Interest coverage
- Days sales outstanding (DSO)
Management and control of Triangle Architectes
Triangle Architectes's publications in the Belgian Gazette
Company number, VAT number and registered office
- Company number (CBE)
- 0439.177.891
- VAT number
- BE0439177891
- Peppol
- Registered · 0208:0439177891 · as of 10 Nov 2026
- Legal form
- SRL
- Incorporated
- 01 Dec 1989
- Registered office
- 4000 Liège
- Latest accounts
- 2025 · filed on 03 Jun 2026
- Activity
- Activities of building architects (NACE 71111)
Triangle Architectes (SRL) has been based in Liège since 1989, active in: activities of building architects. For 2025, it reports a net profit of 105,740 € and equity of 141,579 €; its revenue is not published. Its solvency stands at 61.0%, above the median of its sector (48.0%).
Companies similar to Triangle Architectes
Companies in the same business, of comparable size and area, outside its group.
- 3Line Architecten Architectural activities Izegem · balance sheet 231,880 €
- ALIX Architectural activities Roosdaal · balance sheet 231,755 €
- Puurarchitectuur Architectural activities Landen · balance sheet 231,667 €
- XVDH Architecture Architectural activities Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve · balance sheet 231,535 €
- Architectenburo JAN J Martele Architectural activities Oostkamp · balance sheet 232,604 €
- Vonk Architecten Architectural activities Antwerp · balance sheet 232,887 €
- lttl architecte Architectural activities Anderlecht · balance sheet 232,912 €
- APSIS - BUREAU MULTIPROFESSIONNEL D'ARCHITECTES, société civile à forme de société privée à responsabilité limitée Architectural activities Stoumont · balance sheet 232,919 €
Frequently asked questions about Triangle Architectes
What is the revenue of Triangle Architectes?
Triangle Architectes files its accounts in a format where revenue is optional: it is not published for 2025.
What is the VAT number of Triangle Architectes?
In Belgium, the VAT number is the company number prefixed with BE: BE0439177891 for Triangle Architectes, if the company is VAT-registered. Its company number (CBE) is 0439.177.891.
Where is the registered office of Triangle Architectes?
According to the CBE register, the registered office of Triangle Architectes is in 4000 Liège.
What is the equity of Triangle Architectes?
At the close of the 2025 financial year, the equity of Triangle Architectes amounts to 141,579 €, a solvency of 61.0% of total assets.
Who manages Triangle Architectes?
The register lists 2 active mandates at Triangle Architectes. Names and roles are in the full file, with the deeds published in the Belgian Gazette.
The full file of Triangle Architectes
Directors and mandates, ownership network, Gazette deeds, ten years of accounts and ratios, Excel export, and Idonis's analysis in one question.
Open the full file →